Saturday 17 August 2024

Mum Jailed For "Pimping" 11 Year-Old Daughter Online

Kingston-upon-Thames Crown Court 
A mother is starting a twelve-month prison sentence after she was caught discussing the sexual abuse of her 11 year-old daughter and sending explicit images of her to a dangerous paedophile.

“You were pimping your eleven year-old girl for sex to dangerous people online,” Judge Subhankar Banerjee told the 34 year-old. 


“You said to a now convicted and very dangerous convicted paedophile that you would like your daughter tied up with rope. This case is in a category all of its own.”


The mother, of Station Road North, Egham, Surrey pleaded guilty to three counts of making indecent images of children.


Sixty-two were the most extreme, Category A, plus twenty-two Category B images and eight Category C.


She cannot be named, in order to protect the identity of her daughter.


Kingston-upon-Thames Crown Court heard seventeen of the images were of the woman’s daughter and the remainder were of extreme content she found online.


She also pleaded guilty to publishing an obscene article regarding the sexual abuse of her daughter, plus a charge of distributing two Category C images of her child.


Sordid Online Chats: Kevin Walsh
Her sordid online chats were with 59 year-old Kevin Walsh, currently serving a sentence of eight years and eight months for other child sex offences.


Surrey Police began investigating the mother on March 15, last year after finding evidence of sexualised conversations about her daughter online.


She was traced and arrested at Heathrow Airport and officers found sexually explicit images of children on her phone and laptop, including two year old pictures of her daughter when she was just nine years-old.


Prosecutor Thomas Ford told the court: “This is a particularly distasteful case of taking indecent pictures of her daughter and forwarding them to strangers while discussing the sexual abuse of the girl.


“There were discussions with Mr Walsh about them both abusing the daughter and this defendant told him her daughter’s name and sent images of her.


“She invited him to ‘breed us’ and when Mr Walsh said restraints would be necessary for the girl this defendant suggested rope could be used.”


The mother was questioned by police regarding her invitations online to ‘destroy us both’ and ‘abuse us both.’


“She claimed she was just saying things people wanted to hear to feel loved and wanted,” added the prosecutor.


The girl’s father told police he was “in tears and physically sick” at the defendant’s “disgusting actions.”


The mother’s lawyer Robert Slinn said: “Fortunately Mr Walsh was over the limit and not able to drive to the defendant when they discussed meeting.


“This can be described as exchanges of a grotesque fantasy.


“She said to the pre-sentence report officer that looking back the details make her feel sick and accepts it was abuse.


“Her relationship with her daughter is forever tarnished and orders of this court and the Family Court means access is permanently barred.


“The child is no longer in her care and there is no prospect of a return.”


Judge Banerjee told the woman: “The bond between a mother and daughter is a uniquely special one. She was entitled to trust you provide love, affection, protection and guidance.


“You abused the trust she had in you in the most grotesque way imaginable. Sexual images of her were found on your phone over a period of two years.


“You distributed those images with her face showing and real name to Mr Walsh, an extremely dangerous man and that was the world into which you plunged yourself and daughter.


“She may never recover from the abuse you inflicted on her. Her image is out there now, obscene images.


“She feels fear from that and has already started to self-harm by cutting herself.”


The obese mother showed no emotion during the sentencing hearing, which was attended by many family members.


She was also made subject to a ten-year Sexual Harm Prevention Order and must sign the sex offenders register for the same period.

No comments: