|
St. Mark's Church, Wimbledon |
A so-called
'Mary Poppins' nanny - serving nine months for stealing from her
employers' £4m Belgravia home - has admitted pinching a pensioner
churchgoer's iPhone.
Emma Jane
Currie, 45, who is currently locked-up in HMP Bronzefield, Surrey
still maintains the lie her ex-employer ripped her off and owes her
wages.
She was
produced from the prison and appeared in the secure dock at Wimbledon
Magistrates Court wearing a pink cardigan and pink and blue floral
scarf.
She pleaded
guilty to stealing the £300 phone, belonging to 82 year-old Pamela
Royle, at St. Mark's Church, St. Mark's Place, Wimbledon on February
4, this year.
In June she
was jailed at the Old Bailey for withdrawing £900 cash from the bank
card of her employer, 41 year-old Zoe
Appleyard-Ley and trying to take another £400.
Her
lawyer Mr. Michael Sprack told the court: “The reason for the
severe sentence was she stole from her employers and there was
animosity. She was owed money by her employer.”
Prosecutor
Miss Mary Atere said Currie was arrested as a suspected burglar when
squatting in a Wimbledon property on March 20.
When
searched at Sutton Police Station Mrs Royal's iPhone was found on
her, which the victim had last seen at the church, where Currie was a
regular.
"This
defendant was there helping out," explained Miss Atere. “The
complainant was afraid the person who had the phone would find out
where she was.
“There
were a lot of homeless people at the church.”
Mr. Sprack
said: “My client attended the church on a regular basis and found
the phone and took it. There was no hint of confrontation.
“There was
no attempt to use the phone.
“My client
was of no fixed abode and had been for some time. She was arrested
for squatting.
“On the
sentence she is serving she has two weeks to serve, but there is a
possibility of a custodial sentence in this matter.
“She was
working for the person who was the complainant as a
nanny/housekeeper.
“There was
a dispute and she was owed a large amount of money from that person.
The conviction is for taking money from that person.
“Her
employer had threatened her with bad references.”
Magistrates
adjourned the case until September 11 for a pre-sentence report and
chairwoman Mrs Catherine Gibson told Currie: “We're looking at a
community order, but we are not making any promises.
“It is in
your interests to co-operate. We believe you will benefit from some
structure to tour life when you are released from prison.”
Investment
banker Mrs Appleyard-Ley - who worked for Rothschild Ventures and
Durlacher Ventures - was made to regret hiring Currie via internet
site 'Gumtree' to live and work at her Chester Row property.
She
told the Old Bailey of her “earth-shattering pain and sense of
betrayal” at the hands of Currie.
She
only realised something was amiss when Currie did not bring her a cup
of tea in bed and then allegedly found her jewellery, laptop and iPad
were missing from her home.
The
former City high-flyer found her designer handbag containing her bank
cards was gone and her car was missing from the drive.
Currie
was accused of using her boss's stolen credit card to rack up bills
of around £1,000 at several high street stores, including Oliver
Bonas, Boots, Superdrug and Monsoon.
The
court heard a total of £89,000 worth of stolen property was
recovered, but another £81,000, including a Cartier watch, has never
been found.
Mrs
Appleyard-Ley is separated from her husband Sven Ley - a
self-employed art dealer whose family founded fashion label Escada.
She
hired Currie in May, 2013 to assist looking after her two children,
aged four and six and assist the running of Life Neurological
Research Trust, a charity launched in memory of her aunt Baroness
Ziki Wharton, who died from Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.
Currie
was still driving around in the Mercedes ML350 - bought by the family
nine days earlier - when police pulled her over near Gatwick.
After
her arrest, Currie told police she took the car as her employer owed
her £1,600 in wages, adding that she had worked for three weeks
without a day off.
She
told the court the figure included 'overtime, working seven day weeks
without a break for three weeks and also holiday pay'.
She
went on to claim she had consent to drive the Mercedes to the south
coast to look for a mobile home to live in after handing in her
notice to Mrs Appleyard-Ley on the agreement she would return.
She
described the allegation she had stolen jewellery as “preposterous”,
adding: “My personal feeling is that this is in the guise of
getting a nice insurance claim for the person involved, the
employer.”
She
claimed: “This whole thing is a bit of a hoax with the jewellery
because I've never seen expensive jewellery.”
Giving
evidence, Currie also explained she had clothes from the
Appleyard-Ley home in the Mercedes because she had been asked to take
them to be dry cleaned.
She
said that she had bought goods using her employer's credit card in
shops such as Oliver Bonas because she had been asked to buy presents
for her children's teachers and friends.
Currie
made a series of allegations against her boss during the trial,
claiming she took cocaine and even had Nazi memorabilia in her home.
Two
days after she was pulled over she made a bogus child abuse complaint
to social services, accusing Mrs Appleyard-Ley of slapping her son.
The
jury had failed to reach verdicts on counts of attempted theft, three
of fraud and one of attempted fraud.
Judge
Mark Lucraft said: “Emma-Jane Currie you were employed by Mrs
Appleyard-Ley following a posting on Gumtree.
“She
met you, interviewed you and took you on as a live-in nanny, for home
help and to help run her charity.
“You
started working for her on 20 May and worked for her and her family
through to mid-June.”
He
added: “On Monday, 17 June, you left the Appleyard-Ley home that
morning before Mrs Appleyard-Ley was up.
“You
took and used a bank card, you checked the balance and you then
withdrew £900 cash and attempted to take £200 from the same
cashpoint and when that didn't work you tried another cashpoint.
“When
Mrs Appleyard-Ley realised her car and belongings were gone she
called the phone number for you but you didn't respond.
“You
were arrested the following day at about midday near Gatwick Airport.
“It
is unclear where you went from the time of leaving London and your
arrest.
“In
that period of time £500 of the £900 you took had gone, your
account as to what you did in that period of time simply doesn't
stack up.
“In
this trial you sought to distract the jury by making very serious
allegations about Mrs Appleyard-Ley, that she drank to excess and was
taking drugs.
“You
also said she had lied about your actions to make a false insurance
claim and made allegations of her abusing her children.
“That
last allegation led to the involvement of social services who
concluded that it was without foundation and malicious.
“Social
services said you failed to assist them in the investigation.
“You
also sought to implicate the police by claiming they took the missing
£500 cash when you were detained.
“Mrs
Appleyard-Ley spoke powerfully about the impact not only of the theft
but the trial process and the impact of the false allegations about
her personal conduct.
“The
impact of this will be long lasting on her, particularly that she had
placed a high degree of trust for you to live in her home and care
for her children.'
The
judge continued: “This was theft was committed in breach of a high
degree of trust, it's difficult to think of a higher degree of trust.
“You
were employed by Mrs Appleyard-Ley in trust of her children, home and
some finances.
“In
light of the nature of the breach of trust, the way suspicion was
thrown on others and the way you sought to argue this case it is not
appropriate to suspend the sentence.”
Currie
was also handed a restraining order not to contact the victim or any
of her close family members.